Design
Wireframing that holds up under real users.
We focus on clickable flows before engineering commits to architecture. Written scope, your stack, weekly demos — no account-manager layer.
Signup completion dropped after wireframing. Most teams over-scope it. We write acceptance criteria first, then ship in 2 weeks for a focused flow redesign with Figma in your repo — not a parallel codebase that rots.
Rebrands before fixing conversion are expensive distractions.
We won't hand off without a prioritized fix list, not just pretty screens.
Who this is for
- -Product designers underwater — need wireframing for one critical flow.
- -Founders relaunching and need wireframing before paid traffic scales.
- -Engineering leads who want wireframing that builds cleanly in React.
- -Growth leads where wireframing should move signup or demo conversion.
Problems we solve
- -Wireframing estimates balloon because acceptance criteria were never written.
- -A previous vendor shipped wireframing that broke on edge cases in week two.
- -Your team lacks bandwidth to own wireframing while shipping the core product.
- -Integrations around Figma are fragile and nobody owns on-call.
- -Stakeholders disagree on what "wireframing done" means — so nothing ships.
What we deliver
- -Written scope for wireframing with explicit in/out of scope
- -Weekly demo — live or recorded — with decisions logged
- -Acceptance checklist signed before production launch
- -Runbook for the failure modes we expect in month one
- -Handoff doc so your team can maintain without us
- -Working implementation in your repo using Figma and Vue
How we work
- 1.Audit: existing Figma setup and failure modes
- 2.Design: approach, risks, and test plan before code
- 3.Implement: focused build with explicit done criteria
- 4.Validate: staging sign-off, then production with rollback plan
Why Futurebits
- -Weekly demos with written decisions — not status decks.
- -Stack-first: we start with Figma unless the audit says otherwise.
- -Direct access to the people writing code or design files.
Frequently asked questions
Can you stay on after Wireframing launches?
Yes — maintenance sprints or a partner retainer. Many teams keep us for the next bottleneck once v1 is stable.
Who on your team works on Wireframing?
The same small team from kickoff to launch — not a rotating bench. You talk to the people writing code or design files.
What does the first week of Wireframing look like?
Access, repo setup, and a written scope draft. No build until you sign off on cut lines and the metric we're targeting.
Do you work with our existing Figma or Vue setup?
Yes, when it's sane. We audit first and tell you if something needs replacing — we won't rip out working infra for sport.
What if we already started Wireframing in-house?
We pick up from current state, document what's there, and focus on what's blocking launch — not a rewrite unless necessary.
Related services
UI/UX Design
UI/UX Design by Futurebits: flows where users drop off — not decorative screen refreshes. Direct access to the people doing the work.
Product Design
Product Design by Futurebits: problem framing through shipped UI in Figma and code. Fixed window quoted after a 30-minute scoping call.
Web App Design
Web App Design by Futurebits: web product UI that engineers can build from components. Acceptance tests signed before we call it done.
SaaS UI Design
SaaS UI Design by Futurebits: SaaS patterns for onboarding, settings, and billing screens. Fixed window quoted after a 30-minute scoping call.
SaaS Development
SaaS Development by Futurebits: billing, onboarding, and the first paid customer path. Ship in your stack with explicit cut lines up front.
MVP Development
MVP Development by Futurebits: one testable hypothesis — not a feature wish list. Acceptance tests signed before we call it done.